Cutlery to be used at the table was invented in Byzantium. Europeans initially thought the idea was ridiculous, as they were accustomed to eating food directly off the table with their fingers or biting mouthfuls directly from a grilled carcass.
Do you eat dirt cookies as well?
Using chopsticks has had a negative effect on some Asian cuisine also. Everything must be chopped up or smoothied before serving. You won't see large cuts of protein unless it is fish that can be torn apart like a culture.
A T-Bone steak dinner with baked potato is impossible for the Chinese/Japanese citizen to imagine.
Obligate carnivores are bad eating. It's also discourteous to eat your friends.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Salmon, for example, is a predatory fish that tastes great. Never had dog or cat so I can’t say whether they taste good or not. But this is besides the point as it doesn’t demonstrate why eating dogs or cats would be morally wrong.
Also, I’m just as friendly with cows and pigs as I am with dogs and cats, and I suppose that people who eat the latter two don’t place them on a pedestal like you do.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Salmon, for example, is a predatory fish that tastes great.
Oh, sure. I misspoke. Mako shark is also great, fish are built different to land mammals. >Also, I’m just as friendly with cows and pigs as I am with dogs and cats, and I suppose that people who eat the latter two don’t place them on a pedestal like you do.
Are you? Do you keep pigs and cows as pets and work partners? Have they eaten your salt, if you're genuinely asking why people feel differently about them?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I don’t keep cows, pigs, dogs nor cats as pets because I don’t want a pet. I’m just as delighted to encounter cows and pigs as I am to encounter dogs or cats. I do understand why people feel differently about eating them but I don’t think those reactions are sensible.
>why eating dogs or cats would be morally wrong
It's because of coevolution. People that depended on dogs and cats for survival evolved to have an inherent like for them. Dogs had many different active functions like aiding in hunting, tracking, security, etc. Cats were used in a passive role to eat up rodents that were harming crops. That's also why dogs need constant interactions and cats are autonomous. We've only been keeping these animals indoors as "pets" recently, only a few hundred years ago they served valuable roles that humans depended on, which they did for thousands of years. It goes both ways, of course, domesticated dogs and cats recognize humans as friendly and would rarely attack a non-threatening person like a wild animal even if they are feral.
The coevolution that happened with livestock is different, we domesticated them to be raised and killed. There is a level of affection involved since you will spend months feeding/raising/caring for them or they die, but we also evolved to have much less guilt when slaughtering them so that we could actually eat them.
People whose ancestors did not rely on dogs and cats don't care about pets. People whose ancestors never had livestock might feel equal sympathy for them as they do with cats and dogs. Just remember that our modern world is very new and we existed for 200k years before the first word was ever written down.
I don’t see how this would demonstrate why it’d be morally wrong, though, unless you think morality is determined by your inherent emotions of affection.
2 months ago
Anonymous
its morally wrong to expose yourself to dieases and make a show of doing something that could damage society at large of emulated.
2 months ago
Anonymous
I wonder if contracting disease from dogs and cats would be any more likely than from cows and pigs if they were produced the same way. I highly doubt it but I can’t say I’ve looked it up.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>why eating dogs or cats would be morally wrong
It's because of coevolution. People that depended on dogs and cats for survival evolved to have an inherent like for them. Dogs had many different active functions like aiding in hunting, tracking, security, etc. Cats were used in a passive role to eat up rodents that were harming crops. That's also why dogs need constant interactions and cats are autonomous. We've only been keeping these animals indoors as "pets" recently, only a few hundred years ago they served valuable roles that humans depended on, which they did for thousands of years. It goes both ways, of course, domesticated dogs and cats recognize humans as friendly and would rarely attack a non-threatening person like a wild animal even if they are feral.
The coevolution that happened with livestock is different, we domesticated them to be raised and killed. There is a level of affection involved since you will spend months feeding/raising/caring for them or they die, but we also evolved to have much less guilt when slaughtering them so that we could actually eat them.
People whose ancestors did not rely on dogs and cats don't care about pets. People whose ancestors never had livestock might feel equal sympathy for them as they do with cats and dogs. Just remember that our modern world is very new and we existed for 200k years before the first word was ever written down.
2 months ago
Anonymous
There are at least two breeds of dog that were specifically bred to be a food source, and cats just taste like rabbits (ex hobo)
parasites, lack of suitability towards nutrition, inefficient feeding costs, preference for other uses.,
2 months ago
Anonymous
Those are reasons why eating them isn’t efficient or healthy, not why eating them would be morally objectionable.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Those are reasons why eating them isn’t efficient or healthy, not why eating them would be morally objectionable.
those are the same thing.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Well, no, I don’t think so. For example eating crisps isn’t healthy but I certainly wouldn’t consider it morally objectionable. White rice isn’t as nutritious as brown rice but I wouldn’t scold anyone for preferring to eat the former.
2 months ago
Anonymous
> I don’t think so.
you are wrong >For example eating crisps isn’t healthy but I certainly wouldn’t consider it morally objectionable
you are incorrect. >White rice isn’t as nutritious as brown rice but I wouldn’t scold anyone for preferring to eat the former.
that doesn't change the fact that you are commiting an act that has negative moral implications, though generally I would say the white rice is better for you than the brown. Most nutrition in plants is piss poor so you should prioritize A: freshness and B: lack of all contaminants. That can mean hulling the rice if it has worse contaminants.
just because you are immoral and do not value your health and hygene does not mean your actions get to exist in a vaccuum. you buy chips? that makes industrial waste oils used as food profitable.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Alright, those actions are immoral in the moral system you subscribe to. Frankly, I don’t really care about your ethics because that sort of thinking isn’t prevalent in the West.
I don’t mean to state the obvious, which is that morality is subjective, instead what I’m saying is that the moral axioms you’ve apprently chosen aren’t widely recognised and therefore your reasoning doesn’t hold much weight from a practical point of view.
2 months ago
Anonymous
it's the opposite, becuase my views are not common they hold uncommon weight since they represent untapped potential gains in living quality of life. ignoring them is akin to living in sin. note I do not intend to present my moral system as infalible, merely that ignoring it has certain consequences, and pretending those consequences don't exist doesn't make them go away,
2 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody is pretending that having an unhealthy diet has no consequences. I’m simply denying the relevance of your moral system because that is unquestionably related to its prevalence in society. Allow me to elucidate on this with a slightly hyperbolic analogy. Consider that we live in a society where moral norms are derived from the Old Testament. It doesn’t matter whether or not you specifically are an utilitarian and don’t mind working on Sabbath, the rest of the people will stone you to death for it.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Nobody is pretending that having an unhealthy diet has no consequences.
yes, you are.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Where exactly did I claim that?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Those are reasons why eating them isn’t efficient or healthy, not why eating them would be morally objectionable.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Well, I actually didn’t claim that in the post. Could you walk me through the reasoning that led you to this conclusion?
T Bone is a shit cut of steak. Thanks for letting us know your opinion is garbage
https://i.imgur.com/NhrweMO.jpg
>Chopsticks are inferior to Western eating utensils
Yeah but then you're THAT dude at the restaurant. When I get takeout I eat using forks, knives, and spoons. Not Sushi though; I always eat that with my bare hands, as is intended.
Oh yeah and ramen too...it just doesn't taste right if I'm not slurping loudly from chopsticks as I sip half and half popped egg yolk and soup broth. Man if it wasn't for the salt I would eat that shit all day every day, especially now that it's getting cold.
Based, I eat sushi with my hands too. But anything like ramen, pho, rice bowls - I use them sticks
>a T-bone steak dinner with baked potato is impossible for the Chinese/Japanese citizen to imagine.
The fork and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. If they can eat soup with sticks I think they can eat a fucking steak retard.
>Chopsticks are inferior to Western eating utensils
Yeah but then you're THAT dude at the restaurant. When I get takeout I eat using forks, knives, and spoons. Not Sushi though; I always eat that with my bare hands, as is intended.
Oh yeah and ramen too...it just doesn't taste right if I'm not slurping loudly from chopsticks as I sip half and half popped egg yolk and soup broth. Man if it wasn't for the salt I would eat that shit all day every day, especially now that it's getting cold.
Because if you're eating in public you're eating at a restaurant, where those are the utensils provided and the food is prepared with them in mind. They're not the most efficient utensils but fuck me, it's just chopsticks, what "act"?
Forks and chopsticks are both barbarian implements. Food should be eaten with the fingers, the better to savour all sensory elements of the dish. Spoons are acceptable for liquids, and should be carried on your person, along with your knife and your tinderbox.
>Makes contact with rust prone metal >Gets tetanus
The reason why tetanus causes you to arc your back outwards is to let everyone know about how stupid you were
It's nature's sign telling us to stay away from this dumb ass mf
2 months ago
Anonymous
Only virgins get tetanus, chad absorbs the oxidizing iron into the bloodstream
2 months ago
Anonymous
No one uses fucking iron forks you retard. SILVERware was historically made of non-oxidizing metals like SILVER.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Dude eats with his hands kek probably suffers from heavy metal poisoning
2 months ago
Anonymous
>silverware is made of silver
Great insight, but historically most cutlery wasn't silverware because that shit's expensive.
>awkward
not even true, my twitchy ass can fenagle chopsticks breddy gud >fork good for noodle
depends on noodle - linguine and angel hair yes, udon and rigatoni no
>fork can stab >spoon can scoop >two fucking tiny sticks can struggle to grab tiny morsel of food barely enough to even chew I guess I’ll finish my food in 3 months when I finally get it all in my mouth
>At restaurant in Japan >Eating with joysticks like a boss >Think the locals might even ask me for advice >Instead, have hand slapped away and handed a spoon by the waitress.
Forks and spoons are superior, but I partake in using inferior tools when eating in those places, so to not disturb the sensibilities of my lessers, who would otherwise sperg and spit behind my back, building their delusions that I'm unable to use their inferior chopsticks.
Right, thank you for pointing that out. That's a perfect example of a shit for brains retard. He's trying to eat sushi like a 3 year ld's trying to eat mommy's biscuit&fruit mash.
>a perfect example of a shit for brains retard >he's trying to eat sushi like a 3 year ld's trying to eat mommy's biscuit&fruit mash
Yeah...he's using a fork to eat sushi.
Just realized using chopsticks is the Culinaly equivalent of driving a standard transmission vehicle. It's a low effort skill that anyone can learn but there's a few loud individuals that want you to believe it's such an utter waste of time learning but they just come off as retarded and ignorant.
Mostly, the only reason you should buy an automatic is depending on how it actually is for you to drive. If you're in traffick all day there's nothing worse than starting, stopping, shifting, etc. Automatic just makes it easier to relax.
>the only reason you should buy an automatic
I'm buying my first new car in 15 years and just found out that CVT is more efficient than manual. Not by a ton, but it always used to be common knowledge that manuals get better milage.
I went to sushi with my parents the past month. Holy shit, I didn't not realize they were so bad with chopsticks. Just use your hands if you can't use them, it's fine. It was painful to watch them fumbling around. I understand you want to get better, but you don't get better if you only use chopsticks two times a year.
Yeah, but it's a handy little "showoff" skill. Looks good, on a date and I swear the servers and the chefs treat you better. Even if you're a little clumsy, they appreciate the effort.
No. Using chopsticks for Asian food is fun. Stop being a baby, the food is made specifically for chopsticks and they add to the experience. Its on par with plating up McDonald's food, which is fucking rotten, and wrong in every conceivable way. Its made to me eaten out of a crinkle piece of paper and any other way is garbage and everyone knows it.
Sushi hack: Get a normal makizushi instead of a reverse makizushi, ask them not to cut it into pieces, use your hand to pick up the roll, take bites at your leisure.
Bada boom bada bing, now you can throw dice and eat sushi at the same time.
>gets filtered by something starving children are capable of
Sad, many such cases
>uses the tools of starving children
Sad
>outplayed by starving children
The fork and knife were literally invented by starving people to fend of anyone trying to steal their food
No.It was primarly used by the nobilty and spread to the lower classes.
Yeah I wouldn't take advice from china either.
Cutlery to be used at the table was invented in Byzantium. Europeans initially thought the idea was ridiculous, as they were accustomed to eating food directly off the table with their fingers or biting mouthfuls directly from a grilled carcass.
Do you eat dirt cookies as well?
Using chopsticks has had a negative effect on some Asian cuisine also. Everything must be chopped up or smoothied before serving. You won't see large cuts of protein unless it is fish that can be torn apart like a culture.
A T-Bone steak dinner with baked potato is impossible for the Chinese/Japanese citizen to imagine.
One of the most retarded things I've read on here.
tl;dr
>i'm mad I can't do something starving peasant children can manage
The revelation of your startling retardation didn't deserve a thread
>t.seething chinkoid who can’t stop thinking about starving children
we get it homosexual, you’re triggered
Mad
>Everything must be chopped up or smoothied before serving.
This is the most based thing about asian cooking.
I'm here to eat, not to work.
With this mentality it’s easy to understand why asians have no shame in eating household pets
I’m not Asian but I don’t see why dogs and cats would be off-limits when cows and swine aren’t.
Obligate carnivores are bad eating. It's also discourteous to eat your friends.
Salmon, for example, is a predatory fish that tastes great. Never had dog or cat so I can’t say whether they taste good or not. But this is besides the point as it doesn’t demonstrate why eating dogs or cats would be morally wrong.
Also, I’m just as friendly with cows and pigs as I am with dogs and cats, and I suppose that people who eat the latter two don’t place them on a pedestal like you do.
>Salmon, for example, is a predatory fish that tastes great.
Oh, sure. I misspoke. Mako shark is also great, fish are built different to land mammals.
>Also, I’m just as friendly with cows and pigs as I am with dogs and cats, and I suppose that people who eat the latter two don’t place them on a pedestal like you do.
Are you? Do you keep pigs and cows as pets and work partners? Have they eaten your salt, if you're genuinely asking why people feel differently about them?
I don’t keep cows, pigs, dogs nor cats as pets because I don’t want a pet. I’m just as delighted to encounter cows and pigs as I am to encounter dogs or cats. I do understand why people feel differently about eating them but I don’t think those reactions are sensible.
I don’t see how this would demonstrate why it’d be morally wrong, though, unless you think morality is determined by your inherent emotions of affection.
its morally wrong to expose yourself to dieases and make a show of doing something that could damage society at large of emulated.
I wonder if contracting disease from dogs and cats would be any more likely than from cows and pigs if they were produced the same way. I highly doubt it but I can’t say I’ve looked it up.
>why eating dogs or cats would be morally wrong
It's because of coevolution. People that depended on dogs and cats for survival evolved to have an inherent like for them. Dogs had many different active functions like aiding in hunting, tracking, security, etc. Cats were used in a passive role to eat up rodents that were harming crops. That's also why dogs need constant interactions and cats are autonomous. We've only been keeping these animals indoors as "pets" recently, only a few hundred years ago they served valuable roles that humans depended on, which they did for thousands of years. It goes both ways, of course, domesticated dogs and cats recognize humans as friendly and would rarely attack a non-threatening person like a wild animal even if they are feral.
The coevolution that happened with livestock is different, we domesticated them to be raised and killed. There is a level of affection involved since you will spend months feeding/raising/caring for them or they die, but we also evolved to have much less guilt when slaughtering them so that we could actually eat them.
People whose ancestors did not rely on dogs and cats don't care about pets. People whose ancestors never had livestock might feel equal sympathy for them as they do with cats and dogs. Just remember that our modern world is very new and we existed for 200k years before the first word was ever written down.
There are at least two breeds of dog that were specifically bred to be a food source, and cats just taste like rabbits (ex hobo)
parasites, lack of suitability towards nutrition, inefficient feeding costs, preference for other uses.,
Those are reasons why eating them isn’t efficient or healthy, not why eating them would be morally objectionable.
>Those are reasons why eating them isn’t efficient or healthy, not why eating them would be morally objectionable.
those are the same thing.
Well, no, I don’t think so. For example eating crisps isn’t healthy but I certainly wouldn’t consider it morally objectionable. White rice isn’t as nutritious as brown rice but I wouldn’t scold anyone for preferring to eat the former.
> I don’t think so.
you are wrong
>For example eating crisps isn’t healthy but I certainly wouldn’t consider it morally objectionable
you are incorrect.
>White rice isn’t as nutritious as brown rice but I wouldn’t scold anyone for preferring to eat the former.
that doesn't change the fact that you are commiting an act that has negative moral implications, though generally I would say the white rice is better for you than the brown. Most nutrition in plants is piss poor so you should prioritize A: freshness and B: lack of all contaminants. That can mean hulling the rice if it has worse contaminants.
just because you are immoral and do not value your health and hygene does not mean your actions get to exist in a vaccuum. you buy chips? that makes industrial waste oils used as food profitable.
Alright, those actions are immoral in the moral system you subscribe to. Frankly, I don’t really care about your ethics because that sort of thinking isn’t prevalent in the West.
I don’t mean to state the obvious, which is that morality is subjective, instead what I’m saying is that the moral axioms you’ve apprently chosen aren’t widely recognised and therefore your reasoning doesn’t hold much weight from a practical point of view.
it's the opposite, becuase my views are not common they hold uncommon weight since they represent untapped potential gains in living quality of life. ignoring them is akin to living in sin. note I do not intend to present my moral system as infalible, merely that ignoring it has certain consequences, and pretending those consequences don't exist doesn't make them go away,
Nobody is pretending that having an unhealthy diet has no consequences. I’m simply denying the relevance of your moral system because that is unquestionably related to its prevalence in society. Allow me to elucidate on this with a slightly hyperbolic analogy. Consider that we live in a society where moral norms are derived from the Old Testament. It doesn’t matter whether or not you specifically are an utilitarian and don’t mind working on Sabbath, the rest of the people will stone you to death for it.
>Nobody is pretending that having an unhealthy diet has no consequences.
yes, you are.
Where exactly did I claim that?
Well, I actually didn’t claim that in the post. Could you walk me through the reasoning that led you to this conclusion?
>A T-Bone steak dinner with baked potato is impossible for the Chinese/Japanese citizen to imagine.
They just cut it after cooking and before serving?
>here's your baby food sir, would you like a sippy cup with that?
What? Restaurants that are not fast food diners serve steak pre-cut. Potatoes too for that matter.
I think you might be a helmet wearing retard.
When I order a steak, especially at a steakhouse, I expect it to be in one piece and to be go in the proper utensils for cutting it.
And what does this have to do with Asian restaurants?
>goes to shitass steakhouse
>pays 3x what the steak is worth to gamble on seasoning and doneness
>still has to cut the steak
You should eat out at a place that serves raw whole potatoes on the side to balance out the well done steak.
I'm not sure I've ever gotten a steakhouse steak at the correct doneness
Yeah, no. Only in -certain- parts of the world.
>Restaurants that are not fast food diners serve steak pre-cut. Potatoes too for that matter.
In what planet? I mean, part of the fun in a steak is to keep the juices in until you cut it.
T Bone is a shit cut of steak. Thanks for letting us know your opinion is garbage
Based, I eat sushi with my hands too. But anything like ramen, pho, rice bowls - I use them sticks
>a T-bone steak dinner with baked potato is impossible for the Chinese/Japanese citizen to imagine.
The fork and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. If they can eat soup with sticks I think they can eat a fucking steak retard.
>gets filtered by the invention of more complex tools than a pair of twigs
Sad
Bro those people eat fucking mud sit the fuck down.
chinese > japanese
i want squared off wood i can wash and reuse rather than pointy disposable splinter factories
>Chopsticks are inferior to Western eating utensils
Yeah but then you're THAT dude at the restaurant. When I get takeout I eat using forks, knives, and spoons. Not Sushi though; I always eat that with my bare hands, as is intended.
Oh yeah and ramen too...it just doesn't taste right if I'm not slurping loudly from chopsticks as I sip half and half popped egg yolk and soup broth. Man if it wasn't for the salt I would eat that shit all day every day, especially now that it's getting cold.
frfr no cap forks be BUSSIN
Who cares if one is inferior to another? If you like using one utensil, use it. If someone gives you shit for it, kill them.
Opinion ignored
Oh my nonscience is that a face diaper
Reddit cringe
Not really, you made a reddit kneejerk post and he dunked on you epicly, his post was funny, yours was derivative and gay!
triggered snowflake is triggered
good...i can feel your seethe. go ahead, reply to your post again, give into your anger
Great catch. The great wuhan plague really did ruin a generation.
based
I am weeb but I still think it is cringe how white people use chopsticks in public. Why put on this act? especially for noodles
sushi I would just use fingers
Because if you're eating in public you're eating at a restaurant, where those are the utensils provided and the food is prepared with them in mind. They're not the most efficient utensils but fuck me, it's just chopsticks, what "act"?
asians have to learn from child how to use them
awkward to use if your culture does not use them
plus not even as good as fork for noodles anyway
Forks and chopsticks are both barbarian implements. Food should be eaten with the fingers, the better to savour all sensory elements of the dish. Spoons are acceptable for liquids, and should be carried on your person, along with your knife and your tinderbox.
>touches food without washing his hands
>contracts intestinal parasites
How could this have been avoid if I had just used basic cutlery
>Makes contact with rust prone metal
>Gets tetanus
The reason why tetanus causes you to arc your back outwards is to let everyone know about how stupid you were
It's nature's sign telling us to stay away from this dumb ass mf
Only virgins get tetanus, chad absorbs the oxidizing iron into the bloodstream
No one uses fucking iron forks you retard. SILVERware was historically made of non-oxidizing metals like SILVER.
Dude eats with his hands kek probably suffers from heavy metal poisoning
>silverware is made of silver
Great insight, but historically most cutlery wasn't silverware because that shit's expensive.
>awkward
not even true, my twitchy ass can fenagle chopsticks breddy gud
>fork good for noodle
depends on noodle - linguine and angel hair yes, udon and rigatoni no
You fucking broccoli head zoomer (you are correct tho)
Sorry I don’t take advice from nations that don’t win wars anymore
They better for eating meals prepared for chopstick use though. Eating some shabu shabu with a fork? Don't think so.
asians don't have a hard time using a fork. you just have zero dexterity
t. white
Because forks are better. What kind of backwards ass argument are you trying to make?
t. competent with chopsticks
I doubt you are.
Chopsticks are not hard to use at all chang. They are just objectively worse tho.
Sound like you don’t can use chopsticks.
Sounds like you are esl you retarded chinksect lmao
you are baby who can’t not use simple tools XD
>fork can stab
>spoon can scoop
>two fucking tiny sticks can struggle to grab tiny morsel of food barely enough to even chew I guess I’ll finish my food in 3 months when I finally get it all in my mouth
>At restaurant in Japan
>Eating with joysticks like a boss
>Think the locals might even ask me for advice
>Instead, have hand slapped away and handed a spoon by the waitress.
>Eating with joysticks
I think I see why she had a problem.
>have hand slapped away and handed a spoon by the waitress
hope you grabbed her hand and stuck it down your pants
why use two chopsticks when god gave me 10 fingers?
>using utensils for sushi
What kind of gay shit is this
Use your hands.
Forks and spoons are superior, but I partake in using inferior tools when eating in those places, so to not disturb the sensibilities of my lessers, who would otherwise sperg and spit behind my back, building their delusions that I'm unable to use their inferior chopsticks.
But he's making a giant mess...?
Right, thank you for pointing that out. That's a perfect example of a shit for brains retard. He's trying to eat sushi like a 3 year ld's trying to eat mommy's biscuit&fruit mash.
>a perfect example of a shit for brains retard
>he's trying to eat sushi like a 3 year ld's trying to eat mommy's biscuit&fruit mash
Yeah...he's using a fork to eat sushi.
I want to break that little homosexual's finger
Just realized using chopsticks is the Culinaly equivalent of driving a standard transmission vehicle. It's a low effort skill that anyone can learn but there's a few loud individuals that want you to believe it's such an utter waste of time learning but they just come off as retarded and ignorant.
Good analogy
Automatic is superior but I prefer manual because gear shifts are genuinely satisfying.
Mostly, the only reason you should buy an automatic is depending on how it actually is for you to drive. If you're in traffick all day there's nothing worse than starting, stopping, shifting, etc. Automatic just makes it easier to relax.
>the only reason you should buy an automatic
I'm buying my first new car in 15 years and just found out that CVT is more efficient than manual. Not by a ton, but it always used to be common knowledge that manuals get better milage.
I went to sushi with my parents the past month. Holy shit, I didn't not realize they were so bad with chopsticks. Just use your hands if you can't use them, it's fine. It was painful to watch them fumbling around. I understand you want to get better, but you don't get better if you only use chopsticks two times a year.
It depends on the food. Just use the best tool for the job.
Yeah, but it's a handy little "showoff" skill. Looks good, on a date and I swear the servers and the chefs treat you better. Even if you're a little clumsy, they appreciate the effort.
No. Using chopsticks for Asian food is fun. Stop being a baby, the food is made specifically for chopsticks and they add to the experience. Its on par with plating up McDonald's food, which is fucking rotten, and wrong in every conceivable way. Its made to me eaten out of a crinkle piece of paper and any other way is garbage and everyone knows it.
Ahy is bogdanoff junior eating sushi?
Sushi hack: Get a normal makizushi instead of a reverse makizushi, ask them not to cut it into pieces, use your hand to pick up the roll, take bites at your leisure.
Bada boom bada bing, now you can throw dice and eat sushi at the same time.
Donkey lips lookin motherfucker
fork? impossible
spoon? unwieldy
tongs? too extra
fingers? disgusting
chopsticks are the optimal utensils for picrel