Fried chicken hearts with some leftovers. We should eat all parts of the animal that we slaughter.

Fried chicken hearts with some leftovers. We should eat all parts of the animal that we slaughter.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You didn't kill any animal. You got that out of the grocer's freezer section.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    awesome, and yes, all parts of the animal should be consumed or used in some way.

    when we butcher our animals we do our best with this mindset.

    chickens: we eat all the hearts, liver, gizzard and whatever else we can. we save the necks and feet for broth/stock. we pickle or candy the waddles and comes for eating. once we cook and use as much of the meat as we can, we use the carcass for boiling into stock. we even chill the stock, skim off the fat for shmaltz.

    we take a similar approach for our hogs and sheep. we treat our game (deer) with the same respect. we use the fat for lard and soap, offal gets composted for the garden. we even skin and tan our rabbit pelts to use as arm and leg warmers in the winter.

    your worked for it to live, paid for it to eat. get as much out of it as you can.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All bullshit lies. You redneck fricks shoot and scoot. The number of deer feet you see along the road in Arkansas is suspicious, to say the very least.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We do things a little different in Davenport, Iowa

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >We should eat all parts of the animal that we slaughter.
    Hard to argue against that point/ethic, but I'm still not eating offal.

    Foot boy is not related

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      homosexual

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      there's no actual argument for 'you have to eat the entire animal'

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't need to eat organs because I'm not a third world piece of shit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You realize muscle is an organ, right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      t. tastelet

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nah that's for browns, the rest of us know we can always get another chicken

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how do you make these things not tough as leather?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Are hearts notoriously leathery? I cooked them for the first time and they became crispy more than anything else.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I put them in a stew once and while everything else was done they were extremely chewy and unpleasant in texture. How did you cook them?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          roast them fast on intense heat, preferably a grill, dont overcook them, boiling makes them tough

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Fried chicken hearts with some leftovers. We should eat all parts of the animal that we slaughter.
    noooo getting proper nutrition is le yucky because i'm a fricking manchild that's still heavily traumatized from trying to eat bitter veggies once!!

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's a nice sentiment, but it's [current year] and I'm not slaughtering any animals.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      don't worry. i kill dogs and cats that are wandering around town. i'll kill your share.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you going to send me bi-weekly care packages with like one dog eyeball, a couple cat thighs, and a selection of sweetbreads? The point isn't about actually slaughtering animals; it's about not eating every part of the animal when you don't have equal access to all parts of all animals slaughtered equally. Like, is the idea that if I eat a couple dozen buffalo wings one week I need to eat half a dozen chicken hearts the next week to balance it out? It just seems silly, and doesn't even make sense in a market economy. Most parts of the animal are being used somewhere; that doesn't mean that I personally need to be consuming them. I mean, god, imagine if you had to eat a chicken breast every time you wanted to have a thigh.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >it's about not eating every part of the animal

          who gives a frick what part of an animal you do or don't eat? this is a complete boomer-homosexual talking point that is entertained by sexless young losers.

          if i want to shoot a fricking animal and just leave it where it falls, i god damned will. i have the fricking right to.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you quote half a sentence and then proceed to attack a complete strawman when that wasn't even the point being made?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >'strawman'

              get off the internet you spineless b***h. you'll never be clever enough to make up for how weak you are.

              shut the frick up. my point is if i want to kill an animal and use NONE of it, for ANYTHING, that's my fricking right and i WILL.

              'you have to use the entire animal' <- fricking why? who gives a shit how much of an animal you 'use'? what the frick is 'waste' even supposed to mean? how can anything be 'wasted', you stupid god damned b***h?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Strawman was the wrong word. That would imply you're attributing a position to me that I didn't make as a way to argue against my actual position. You did the first part, but you're not arguing against my position at all. You didn't even understand my position, and then you once again took one clause out of context and doubled down on getting mad about something I never said or even implied. I entirely agree with you about hunting/fishing; the only thing I really care about with that is that quotas are maintained so that it's sustainable. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making, which was literally that I'm not hunting and slaughtering animals for my food (at least not for the vast majority of it). Based on your seething over literally nothing, I'd guess that if we really got into it I'm far more for individual rights than you are.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                speak fricking sense to me or hold your tongue. not reading your paragraph.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >we should eat all parts of the animal that we slaughter

    this is a tired quip. it's not true, it's hypocritical, and it doesn't mean jack shit. it's one of those generic homosexual boomer mantras

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's pronounced slaughter

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    hate most offal but luv me some blood sausage

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *