My source says 3700-4000 years ago, mister selective reader.
Doesn't matter, because the guy you're arguing with about the grain diet is just as retarded.
>3700-4000 years ago
In siberia, hardly relevantt ograin eaters as siberian tribes were hunter gatherers until yesterday
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/PAVl33y.jpg
>before 4000 years ago all mammoths were extinct
I picked first article, you God damn retard. You're looking for some reddit post who tells you otherwise.
Two people disagree with the same post but they don't agree with one another.
Who's right?
>before 4000 years ago all mammoths were extinct
I picked first article, you God damn retard. You're looking for some reddit post who tells you otherwise.
Why would it need to and how would it improve? Food is food. It's not like people are, generally speaking, inventing new foods. Even more essentially than that, it's not like people are creating new flavors, no? So how would it improve?
Is stronger flavor inherently a good thing? Certainly unpleasant flavors or dishes that are unhealthy (like full of harmful bacteria) aren't good but is stronger flavor really good? I don't think it is.
>4 million years brain evolution due to eating mostly meat >Most 99% of our greatest inventions came during those 6000 years we drank beer
I don't know what to believe anymore.
Probably yes but a part inside of me wants to say no because most "good" food nowadays either gets all it's flavour from a shitton of Hispanices and herbs (compared to bringing out the true flavours of foods through cooking technique) or weird perversions (LETS MAKE FRIED RAVIOLI INSIDE A BOLOGNESE PIZZA!!! YUM!!!!!)
No. Instead of mammoth we now eat grain. We used to be a real tribe.
>dies at 35
There were no mammoths in 1700 bc
It would have taken you so little time and effort to look that up before making a fool of yourself.
>last mammoths died 4000 years ago
>4000 is more than 3723
Anon...
My source says 3700-4000 years ago, mister selective reader.
Doesn't matter, because the guy you're arguing with about the grain diet is just as retarded.
>3700-4000 years ago
In siberia, hardly relevantt ograin eaters as siberian tribes were hunter gatherers until yesterday
Two people disagree with the same post but they don't agree with one another.
Who's right?
>before 4000 years ago all mammoths were extinct
I picked first article, you God damn retard. You're looking for some reddit post who tells you otherwise.
Grain was definitely eaten in antiquity
Retard
Nothing has ever improved
Why would it need to and how would it improve? Food is food. It's not like people are, generally speaking, inventing new foods. Even more essentially than that, it's not like people are creating new flavors, no? So how would it improve?
>So how would it improve?
like toasting soup ingredients before pouring water over them to achieve stronger flavor
Is stronger flavor inherently a good thing? Certainly unpleasant flavors or dishes that are unhealthy (like full of harmful bacteria) aren't good but is stronger flavor really good? I don't think it is.
>Is stronger flavor inherently a good thing?
no. stronger flavour for vegetable ingredients? yes in 98% of cases
>4 million years brain evolution due to eating mostly meat
>Most 99% of our greatest inventions came during those 6000 years we drank beer
I don't know what to believe anymore.
A balanced diet of meat, grains, fruits and vegetables is the best one.
Probably yes but a part inside of me wants to say no because most "good" food nowadays either gets all it's flavour from a shitton of Hispanices and herbs (compared to bringing out the true flavours of foods through cooking technique) or weird perversions (LETS MAKE FRIED RAVIOLI INSIDE A BOLOGNESE PIZZA!!! YUM!!!!!)
What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.