>Hate all indian food. >Love butter chicken with naan bread and rice

>Hate all indian food
>Love butter chicken with naan bread and rice
Why is this?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do you even lamb saag?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      saag on deez nuts?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Gee, anon, maybe you don't hate all Indian food.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because you're fricking moronic.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Youre moronic, best have a nice day

      Because Butter Chicken is a children's dish for baby palates.

      I'd like to reiterate the sentiments of these posters. You suck big wieners.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    simple, butter chicken isn't indian food, it's british food.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Indian food usually isn't Indian food, dickface. It's Bangladeshi or Pakistani

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Youre moronic, best have a nice day

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't like either Rajma or keema matar, your opinion is useless either way.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can't even tell the difference. It's just spices, with more or less paprika for coloring.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Butter chicken is barely Indian. Remember that tomatoes, chili and potato are all new world ingredients and any asian food that uses them originates from getting those ingredients from europeans and often has the influence of european palettes on it. And while we're at it a reminder nipponese curry is literally just low quality UK Navy sloppa the nips borrowed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/HRzfAff.png

      >Hate all indian food
      >Love butter chicken with naan bread and rice
      Why is this?

      Also almost all the rest of the 'good' indian dishes are persian or mughal influence from invasion from the north. Everything native that wasn't cooked for invaders is just suspicious shit in thin sauce.

      If you don't like either Rajma or keema matar, your opinion is useless either way.

      >Rajma
      Prime example of a dish using ingredients the europeans brought from the Americas.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tomatoes chilis and potatoes are not from Europe lmao

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        indians weren't colonizing the new world friend, at least not back then, they got those ingredients from european traders

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          So what you're telling me is it's still an Indian dish? What kind of useless fricking posts are you about?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's some snaggletooth Luke with an inferiority complex mad that his national dish is Indian

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nice reading comprehension moron.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't know about Butter Chicken but Vindaloo is actually inspired from a portuguese dish

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Butter chicken is officially claimed as an invention by a bunch of different restaurants in the early 1950s in India, yet not written down until the 1970s which is the same time it shows up in print in westernised Indian food. It's more likely to have been native to what is now Pakistan before that though. The same also goes for dal makhani, paneer makhani and even tandoori chicken all of which suspiciously got 'invented' by hindu refugees from pakistan right after partition conveniently removing any prior history. Genuinely every well regarded Indian food originates with another culture while their native food is the weird brown slop you see in webm threads. As you'd expect from a culture that fries cow shit.

        The reason the Pakistan area had such good food relative to the rest of India was the Mughals.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Also turns out the portugeese or mughals are probably responsible for panner and similar cheeses since the hindu population considered rennet taboo (cow product) and never quite worked out acidification on their own + it's absent from any historical records pre-17th century. The rabbit hole deepens, but what the hell were they even eating originally?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I always wondered what jeet food was like before tomatoes and chilis and potatoes were brought over from the Americas.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Butter Chicken is a children's dish for baby palates.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Chicken in a creamy sauce served with greasy bread and rice
    You liking it has nothing to do with India.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hate all indian food
    >actually no i don't
    man, being a woman is a serious mental handicap, isn't it

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    80% of indian food tastes the same so thats a good question OP

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    there's no such thing as "indian food" you western homosexual
    India has two billion people with as many cuisines. equivalent to your moronic thread
    >Hate all western food
    >Love aHispanic
    Why is this?
    homosexual

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's funny, People say that all the time but I've yet to see those mythical cuisines that totally have nothing to do with each other and have somehow completely flown under the radar

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This type of Indian food is slop created for British and westerners. I've had Indian food with paneer that's served like a crisp French soup and tastes delicious.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP is a homosexual and so is this guy but I followed his recipe and it tasted better than anything I've had at an Indian restaurant

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *