I can see the utility in lowering the demand for animal based products which would may mean better treatment for the current ones or overall less slaughter which could have some environmental pros.
People that want to cut down on their meat consumption but aren't ready to make the full switch. >I would never want or like this, HOW IN THE WORLD can someone else feel differently?
get over it, people like/ want different things than you.
This is actually pretty accurate. Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production and if it doesn't impact the taste and texture the standard consumers won't care, plus it is probably nutritionally better than 100% beef.
The only problem is that the butthurt carnivore enthusiasts hate everything healthy and the butthurt meat replacement product lovers will try to convince everyone that 100% plant based would be as good.
>Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production
Absolutely wrong. Meat is part of an incredibly efficient system of production. Cows are fed inedible plant byproducts that would otherwise go to waste, they then produce milk, and eventually beef. You grossly underestimate just how efficient farming practices are if you think producing plants en masse would not only be cheaper, but more practical.
Cattle can also graze on nonarable land that you couldn't even grow plants on anyway. Plant-based proponents really don't have the first clue about the real world.
Dairy cattle aren't used for meat, they are entirely different.
You are otherwise correct that meat is solar powered and lab grown meat will never be cost effective.
It's extremely disturbing for government policies to be made by people who think farms shouldn't exist because people should just use grocery stores. They have no concept of what arable land is and think population is limited by building sizes.
>Dairy cattle aren't used for meat, they are entirely different.
That's not entirely true. Once they stop producing, they are slaughtered and sold as lower grades (standard, utility, canner, cutter).
Dumbest retard post I've seen today. Nothing about destroying forests and indirecting fertilizer on grass is going to make it more efficient than just growing a bunch of soybeans directly.
>Cows are fed inedible plant byproducts that would otherwise go to waste
You mean like gigantic fields of gmo corn and soy grown specifically for animal feed you son of a fresh bitch?
Soy is grown primarily for pigs and poultry. Herbivores dont need that much protein.
Even cafo cows mostly are fed grass like hay and silage, then finished on corn. Grass fed is kind of bullshit since all cows are fed grass. >t. livestock autist
>Cows are fed inedible plant byproducts that would otherwise go to waste
You mean like gigantic fields of gmo corn and soy grown specifically for animal feed you son of a fresh bitch?
You still need pablos to beat the shit out of the cows when it starts cannibalizing itself and you need them to keep their shit from mixing with their drinking water
Meanwhile growing soy can be done almost entirely with machines
What? You're saying we should pass on the savings from massively cutting costs of a staple good onto consumers during a depression? Get the fuck out of my office, you filthy gentile.
>You're saying we should pass on the savings from massively cutting costs of a staple good onto consumers during a depression?
can you show me where in my post i said that?
I'm cracking a joke you fucking sperglord, but, if you insist:
The statement of "the price doesn't reflect that" implies that the costs of producing plant based meat are extremely out of proportion with the sales price - I.E. profit margins are huge. It would, in theory, make sense to cut sale prices to pass this value onto consumers and drive demand for ersatz-meat, but the joke is that the executives at these ersatz-meat companies are too greedy to do that and would rather just force it down consumers' throats.
>Heavily processed plant material full of as much meat cope chemists could come up with >It's more expensive
Not shocked at all. The product in OP could be cheaper purely because it's just black bean and soy doctored beef without any cope chemistry and dark voodoo protein texturing.
No it's not nutritionally better
Cows, even cows who live in misery covered in shit full of cancer and infection produce meat that even blended with 30% fat is still healthier than soy that has 20 different industrial process and is mixed with toxic shit to make It edible, that soy contains more processed oil than the beef contains fat because they have to trick your brain into thinking you are consuming something good
companies have been doing this for years with the cheap stuff. They just don’t advertise that it’s only half beef
they use tricky things like pic related >”meat used is 100% beef”
>Woketards won't eat it, because Meat Is Evil, or some other homosexual shit. >Normal people won't eat it because it's ridiculous and probably more expensive and less tasty than regular food.
Good fucking business plan.
Why? What is their target demographic?
Health nuts more delusional than vegans and carnies.
Impossible, those people don't exist
People who like the taste of vegan meat replacements but still don't want to miss out on the animal suffering
People too lazy to top their burgers with veggies.
People who want to taste the real thing, and are upset about "climate change" from food production but not enough to go full vegematic.
I can see the utility in lowering the demand for animal based products which would may mean better treatment for the current ones or overall less slaughter which could have some environmental pros.
If I have to be miserable the cow has to be miserable too
People who want to serve beef patties but only want to pay 50% of the price of beef and the other 50% is cheap soy
People that want to cut down on their meat consumption but aren't ready to make the full switch.
>I would never want or like this, HOW IN THE WORLD can someone else feel differently?
get over it, people like/ want different things than you.
Beef w/ filler. Wowee.
If I could stab you to death in the face I would.
This is actually pretty accurate. Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production and if it doesn't impact the taste and texture the standard consumers won't care, plus it is probably nutritionally better than 100% beef.
The only problem is that the butthurt carnivore enthusiasts hate everything healthy and the butthurt meat replacement product lovers will try to convince everyone that 100% plant based would be as good.
You can already put tomatoes, lettuce, onions or whatever vegetables you want on a burger. I really don't see the point from a consumer perspective.
People like what they like, you can suck on deez
>Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production
Absolutely wrong. Meat is part of an incredibly efficient system of production. Cows are fed inedible plant byproducts that would otherwise go to waste, they then produce milk, and eventually beef. You grossly underestimate just how efficient farming practices are if you think producing plants en masse would not only be cheaper, but more practical.
Cattle can also graze on nonarable land that you couldn't even grow plants on anyway. Plant-based proponents really don't have the first clue about the real world.
Oh and cows also produce the fertiliser that your precious plants need.
Dairy cattle aren't used for meat, they are entirely different.
You are otherwise correct that meat is solar powered and lab grown meat will never be cost effective.
It's extremely disturbing for government policies to be made by people who think farms shouldn't exist because people should just use grocery stores. They have no concept of what arable land is and think population is limited by building sizes.
>Dairy cattle aren't used for meat, they are entirely different.
That's not entirely true. Once they stop producing, they are slaughtered and sold as lower grades (standard, utility, canner, cutter).
Dumbest retard post I've seen today. Nothing about destroying forests and indirecting fertilizer on grass is going to make it more efficient than just growing a bunch of soybeans directly.
>destroying forests and indirecting fertilizer on grass
neither of these are necessary for cattle
You don't know what you're talking about. Grasslands have uses outside of monocropping.
>Cows are fed inedible plant byproducts that would otherwise go to waste
You mean like gigantic fields of gmo corn and soy grown specifically for animal feed you son of a fresh bitch?
Soy is grown primarily for pigs and poultry. Herbivores dont need that much protein.
Even cafo cows mostly are fed grass like hay and silage, then finished on corn. Grass fed is kind of bullshit since all cows are fed grass.
>t. livestock autist
>Grass fed is kind of bullshit since all cows are fed grass.
we got a real genius over here
🙂
You still need pablos to beat the shit out of the cows when it starts cannibalizing itself and you need them to keep their shit from mixing with their drinking water
Meanwhile growing soy can be done almost entirely with machines
>Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production
the price doesn't reflect that
What? You're saying we should pass on the savings from massively cutting costs of a staple good onto consumers during a depression? Get the fuck out of my office, you filthy gentile.
>You're saying we should pass on the savings from massively cutting costs of a staple good onto consumers during a depression?
can you show me where in my post i said that?
I'm cracking a joke you fucking sperglord, but, if you insist:
The statement of "the price doesn't reflect that" implies that the costs of producing plant based meat are extremely out of proportion with the sales price - I.E. profit margins are huge. It would, in theory, make sense to cut sale prices to pass this value onto consumers and drive demand for ersatz-meat, but the joke is that the executives at these ersatz-meat companies are too greedy to do that and would rather just force it down consumers' throats.
>Plant 'meat' is probably like 1000x cheaper in production
It costs twice as much as real meat
>Heavily processed plant material full of as much meat cope chemists could come up with
>It's more expensive
Not shocked at all. The product in OP could be cheaper purely because it's just black bean and soy doctored beef without any cope chemistry and dark voodoo protein texturing.
No it's not nutritionally better
Cows, even cows who live in misery covered in shit full of cancer and infection produce meat that even blended with 30% fat is still healthier than soy that has 20 different industrial process and is mixed with toxic shit to make It edible, that soy contains more processed oil than the beef contains fat because they have to trick your brain into thinking you are consuming something good
have a nice day
Nice marketing attempt. Buy an ad.
Imagine putting filler in your meat and touting it as a good thing.
fuck you my moms meatloaf is good
>People won't buy our garbage fakemeat, so we'll just use it as filler for all the real meats!
Evil.
There are people who don't already put egg, breadcrumbs, diced onion, tomato puree and some kind of sauce in their homemade burgers?
That's meatloaf. Or salisbury steak. Or swedish meatballs. All good, but not a burger.
If it looks like a burger patty and sits in a burger bun, it's a burger
So I can just take a fat solid shit, mash it with my foot, then put it between ballpark buns? Cool!
Yes, the format is a burger.
Edibility is your problem.
incorrect
so it's israeli. stealing good genes with crap ideology underneath
cutting minced mushroom into your ground beef for burgers is legit tasty.
If it's actual veggies, not plant protein reformed into fauxmeat, I can be down.
Is this a joke? A burger with salad on has plants.
>Buy our meat + Filler but now for 80% more than just buying meat!
Ten years ago, 50% beef 50% filler would have been called a rip off and gross slop garbage. Now people willingly pay extra and I'm baffled.
when there isn't strong culture / civilization, marketing fills the void
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ersatz_good
and here I thought ersatz goods were for poor, socialist countries. Oh, wait.
people need to stop eating processed shit, it will kill you.
Remember you are the carbon they are trying to reduce
Oh look, it's another AI generated spam thread on Culinaly.
Good job asiaticMoot for destroying one of the very few decent boards on this shithole with your sellout trash.
>AI
It's actually another fine product from California.
https://5050foods.com/
yeap
companies have been doing this for years with the cheap stuff. They just don’t advertise that it’s only half beef
they use tricky things like pic related
>”meat used is 100% beef”
literally meatloaf, wtbd
>Woketards won't eat it, because Meat Is Evil, or some other homosexual shit.
>Normal people won't eat it because it's ridiculous and probably more expensive and less tasty than regular food.
Good fucking business plan.
why