New British planet saving diet advice just dropped.
Anyone got any soda/soft drink recipes? I want to have the least impact so that means turning diet coke into a coke diet.
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
New British planet saving diet advice just dropped. Anyone got any soda/soft drink recipes?
that's just a graph of how nutritious those foods are for you
>sausage rolls are less nutritious than tea
I think I can believe that.
Ah yes, stop eating unprocessed meats and dairy and just live of ready meals sosij rolls and soda, of course
I'm sure when they cut out all beef and lamb and substitute it with fishing it won't have an equally detrimental shift on the environmental cost.
Sounds suspect, I’d want a listing that’s adjusted for serving size and that takes the impact of manufacturing, storage, and post consumption waste into account, otherwise you end up with:
>soda is just water with a little bit of sugar, flavoring, and chemicals so it’s le good for the environment.
What's suspect about not even asking how a product is made or where it's come from to score it on how it's made and where it's come from?
He's a doctor bro he knows
Yeah think of all the plastic waste drinks produce. Coca cola is easily one of the biggest polluters of all time. The dump is full of soda plastics.
Sausage roll somehow has less environmental impact than beef??
Because there's no beef in it? It's 22% pork mince with added fat so they can reach the legally binding "42% meat" mark. The remaining 58% of it is rusk and chemicals.
ah yes, 34.72 units of impact
Units of stress
>ahh yes I don't know how to read a paper or abstract to learn exactly what the numbers mean so instead i'll mock them because it doesn't conform to my "science is gay lol" stance!
>Cheese has less impact than beef
So this graph is nonsense, right? That is physically impossible.
Yes.
The study also has another graph where calorie density and energy density are penalised but fruit, veg, nut and cooking oil density are rewarded. So yorkshire puddings score similarly to vegetables. Chips (fries) are better than salads and fruits. Energy drinks are better than coffee. And desserts are better than going for gluten free bread.
>https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2120584119
>land use
>beef and lamb are fricking maxed out
We usually put beef on land where we can't or it's not feasible to grow crops you could give to people. This is stupid. Farmers have known better for hundreds of years.
>lamb at the top
Absolutely haram
>beef BAD
>beef wrapped in cellophane and stewed in preservative GOOD
>deli meat and cheese
>salad and dips
>beef and lamb
Why are all these mixed together? Also its weird that sausage roll is in there.
>you're responsible for this, goy! stop eating meat or else you'll kill all of us!
These corporations really have the people fooled.
Plus, I can guarantee you'd find Foie Gras, among other 'cruel' and 'wasteful' foods on Klaus Schwab and George Soros' dinner tables.
God I fricking love foie gras
>fizzy drinks
does that include beer?
Bullshit.
>Beef and lamb have an "environmental impact" of 34.72
>Fish and seafood have an "environmental impact" of 6.10
Clearly the dumbass who made this imaginary point system is either pushing an agenda or is completely incompetent. You mean to tell me that beef and lamb has a greater environmental impact than trawling, overfishing, bicatch, and the removal of apex predators from their ecosystem? You're telling me taking a net the size of three soccer fields, dropping it to the bottom of the ocean, and dragging across the ocean for miles, killing everything in its wake, is only about 1/7th as bad as cow farts? You're telling me extinction level events happening in the ocean is only 1/7th as bad as cow farts?
Frick you, Oxford University.
Feels like a shitty psyop. They don't even state what theyre measuring by, is it weight or volume? and why is the selection of foods so fricking weird? and dips are dips not foods on their own, ready meals is so fricking vague, tea makes zero sense its literally just a processed leaf in water, and they dont state the specific product, nor where the seafood came from or what seafood it was.
why is literally every journalist incapable of providing any information? I have yet to see any news channel give the full picture and not some biased sample in my entire fricking life.
Wish there were laws to atleast stop journalists from violently botching info to some degree
but how do we program people if we have to tell the truth?