the lunch

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Looks good anon

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Bland

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    id need to grab some kind of sauce to throw on that chicken but id smash

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hate fitcels.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's a lot of rice. Don't get a tummyache homosexual

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      150 g raw rice (522 kcal)
      150 g cooked chicken breast (250 kcal)

      An hour later, I eat 200 g cooked beans (150 cal)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        your belly is going to burst

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >An hour later, I eat 200 g cooked beans (150 cal)
        Why? You obviously arent hungry

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          this type of diet is literally an eating disorder. don't try to rationalize it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Food consumption in the age of no scarcity necessitates it.

            You need strategies to not overeat

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >You need strategies to not overeat
              Strategy: don't be a moron.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          But I am hungry. I eat 3500 kcal a day.

          Wouldn't a sane person have cooked the chicken with the rice? Its like you're trying to make it as flavorless as possible.

          It's harder to track protein that way as it loses water after cooking, so I weigh it cooked. On weekends I eat whatever the frick.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        why dont you measure your chicken raw

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Anon right now

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    no veggies?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    needs either sauce or a salad

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's good, if i start eating rice i usually do it for weeks and with salmon and butter. it's like heroin to me, i had to break my rice cooker to stop.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Din seesen they chickin

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't a sane person have cooked the chicken with the rice? Its like you're trying to make it as flavorless as possible.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    grim

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    oh my god you're that anon on a bulking diet that doesn't know when to measure food cooked or raw. i see you are improving. beans measured cooked it's good only if you are taking them from the can. but you should still measure chicken raw.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >you should still measure chicken raw.
      why?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If you are counting calories it makes more sense to use the most reliable nutritional information you have e.g. your meat packaging. Then, if you are cooking in bulk, you do a simple calculation to divide your portions.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        because how you cook it is going to change the weight a lot more, based on how much water is lost, or other things are absorbed from whatever its cooked with. raw is way more consistent.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >because how you cook it is going to change the weight a lot more, based on how much water is lost, or other things are absorbed from whatever its cooked with. raw is way more consistent.
          Why not just put the cooked meat on a scale and then use the results from that to do your calculations?
          I'm probably a fricking moron...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can but you have to adjust the nutritional for whatever cooking method you used. For example, if you take 100g raw chicken, and then bake it, it may weight 70g, but if you sous vide it it might weight 90g. Its just harder to estimate and less accurate. But If you cook it in sauce or vegetables it might weight over 100g if it absorbed liquid, so you're measuring weight that isn't chicken. So that won't be accurate at all. You can kind of do it its just more accurate to do raw because there is less variation.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >You can kind of do it its just more accurate to do raw because there is less variation.
              How the frick is it more accurate when you yourself are admitting that it's all just a bunch of guesswork that can be eliminated by using the added variables, and then eliminating them from the finished product?
              Are you THAT fricking bad at math?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The more variables you have to adjust for the less accurate it will be. Imagine your speed gunning a car standing on the side of the road. Its pretty accurate. But image you're in another car going some speed you're not quite sure. 30, 40mph? Yeah you can "guess" and adjust your reading but its less accurate.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            that's exactly the correct way.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It's actually the opposite. Meat loses water as it cooks, so by weighing it cooked you are getting more protein.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            lol no, moron. The meat loses water, so it weighs less, you have the same protein. That's why protein per g of cooked is higher. But the meat doesn't someone grow when you cook it.

            Although again, it could absorb water or sauce or oil if you cook it with other stuff, so it might weight more in that instant you have pretty much no real accurate of way of measuring other than eyeballing the size.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >That's why protein per g of cooked is higher.
              Thanks for agreeing with me.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Would

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You're missing fiber. CBR is the holy trinity for muscular gainz.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *