>le long-term kidney damage >in rats
if you only drank water and had no access to food, you would eventually starve and die. coca cola would also bring negative effects, but you would last longer due to the sugar content
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195650/
i can also paste bullshit studies
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291652206556X
if soft drinks actually caused you to lose your fluids without you even realizing it, then you would hear stories about people dropping dead from it on a regular basis
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195650/
shhh don't tell them. let the fatties die from kidney failure at 40.
>at 40
so you can survive for that long while being dehydrated? and you get fat too?
>Coke is 10% sugar
also if you look online, you will find lots of studies pointing that, despite of the composition, coca cola is actually slightly better at retention than water, and that is specifically because of the sugar contents
sugar is one of the contributing factors that make milk better than water, and coca cola also has it, so the same logic applies
It gets confusing because "hydration" is vaguely defined. You piss less immediately after drinking coke because metabolising the sugar involves using up some of the water. You've retained more water because it's been converted into ATP, but if you're the average obese person walking around with blood thicker than putty, that's not really the main concern.
Your study clearly states stevia solution is better than water.
Also the leap made in that article that sugar water in rats = soft drink in humans is wild. Why not test with soft drink if your goal is to make those claims?
I wonder how those who made the daily intake values justify that it's 10% of daily carbs but 29% of daily sugar, since sugar is just carbs.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's the amount of added sugar you can consume before your risk of health issues starts increasing by larger amounts. But for carbs naturally found in food it's usually not as much of a concern and you can have more.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
By what logic? Carbs are carbs.
And what if I eat sugar cane? There's no 'added' sugar in that.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Carbs are carbs but refined sugars (and starch) cause higher blood sugar spikes which lead to inflammation and a bunch of health issues. Not as much of an issue when you eat fruit, whole grains, etc.
You can't really eat sugar cane because it's so fibrous. If you chewed on it and extracted some sugar you'd probably get a sore jaw before extracting very much.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I've tried sugar cane. it's like chewing on a slightly sweet 2x4.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>If you chewed on it and extracted some sugar you'd probably get a sore jaw before extracting very much.
This is what they do in SEA.
>There's no preservatives
Wrong > Phosphoric acid is added to cola drinks to impart tartness, reduce growth of bacteria and fungi, and improve shelf-life
it's used for tartness AND because it's a preservative.
liver regenerates
you can abuse alcohol and anything and everything at ABUSE LEVELS and if you give the liver a short break, it's fine
it's the magical organ
kidney is not. careful with the kidneys
DNA damages isn't fixable, liver being able to regen or not. That's what alcohol does in the long run. Once the instruction set for cell division is damaged, cells get all fricked up and at that point, it's a coin toss whether or not your immune system or apoptosis (cell death/suicide mechanism) will fix the problem. That's how cancer starts, it could be malignant or not but in general, tumours in an organ is bad news.
but yes for sure drinking alcohol increases overall cancer risk, for sure. it's definitely bad but not insofar as it puts the liver into a cancerous condition
yup
as it stands, the goal would be to avoid things that force your body to roll the dice. sun-tanning is really bad, for example
creating bodyfat from eating too much is also really bad
the idea is that you reduce the cells that can go haywire
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Are they trying to find little newborn D’vontavious’ father? Good luck!
Your cells do not divide in vaccum, your environment and the environment of your cells has causual influence and every toxin you put in has to be processed and excreted, toxins of all kinds and types are created by your system and choosing to tax a system beyond it's limit is where catastrophic failure occurs.
Human bsod
i think the big myth is the food pyramid
or that there is some magic that obviates calories in vs calories out for weight loss
that's probably the biggest one
>calories in vs calories out
That that matters. That you shouldn't actually be looking at satiation index or similar.
If you go to the supermarket and buy diet food (lite n' easy and the like) what you will often find is non diet food in tiny portions. So you'll buy two and your diet will fail so you'll never stop buying diet products.
Stop trying to white knuckle your diet.
>i think the big myth is the food pyramid
I think there is an argument to be made that you should be eating a good variety of food but I don't think that it's as essential as they would have you believe, nor do I think the 'experts' are as educated on what people should be eating as they think
For example, a Japanese person is probably going to happily subsist on a completely different diet to someone from France
[...]
Definitely needs to be communicated more tho.
There are still many people why think you cannot keep cooked(!) chicken outside over night, as if it somehow magically retains its status as a contamination risk meat even after heating it to death and disinfecting.
I'm bad with that but that's just because I'm paranoid about chicken in general, I barely trust it when it's freshly cooked the first time
The food pyramid was created by General Mills to sell more grains. Thats why they switched to myplate and didnt make a sound about all the studies that came back showing a high grain diet is not good for humans. Also why keto is popular
The food pyramid said 2 slices of bread with breakfast, lunch, and dinner would fall within the guidelines. That doesn't really seem to be that much. The food pyramid said you could eat a cheeseburger for every meal with a small salad and piece of fruit and that was acceptable.
Nobody ever really followed it anyway. I'm not sure why it gets so much attention now. I don't remember a single person ever talking about it and using it as a guideline for how they ate. More people talk about it now than they ever did back then.
keto is popular because of marketing, nothing else
"mainstream diet bad therefore my extreme medical restriction diet for epileptics is obviously the one best way to eat!!!" is never going to be a valid argument.
thats a good point, the human body is not a fire nor do we consume 100% of the food we intake which is why we poop
Calories are a measure of the maximum amount of energy in a food item. CICO works because if you’re counting accurately, the food you’re eating will never contain more than what’s labeled (when labeled accurately).
but the right amount of cal is obfuscated by the amount thats actually usable by your body, if you were able to utilize 100% of the cal then your diet should only be 900cal/day but you'd starve if you're eating actual food that only 300cal of that is actually bio-available
I think people get too caught up on thinking CICO is about calculations and strictly following it. It just says things like fiber and water have zero calories. Carbs and protein have a moderate amount of calories. Fat is high in calories. Eating more carbs/protein/fat will lead to weight gain. Eating less leads to weight loss. That's it.
It's not that useful or a perfect answer to everything though. 12 oz of soda has less calories than 8 oz of milk, but milk will keep you satiated longer and cause you to consume less calories overall.
Calorie counts on food labelling take into account an estimate of how much the body actually uses.
By what logic? Carbs are carbs.
And what if I eat sugar cane? There's no 'added' sugar in that.
>Carbs are carbs.
Glucose is glucose, it and its chains (most "carbs") get used directly by most body cells. Fructose is primarily metabolised in the liver and used to synthesise fat.
Where do you think the energy comes from? The molecules don't have a special flavour shell, it's the exact same thing. Food and oxygen go in, heat and carbon dioxide come out.
any time you are boosting your cells you are risking cancer somewhere
this can be done with anything
without sounding like a complete loon, i have concluded that cancer is inevitable and behaviors can accelerate it. it is a roll of dice, a million times over every day
>Constipation isn't real
Oh yes it does. I have spit out shits out of my anus that hurt so bad that it felt like I was giving birth. Had to take out more than one shit out of the toilet with a plastic bag to throw it out because it was too huge to flush down. The shits that I had to take out of the toilet had such a thick consistency that it felt like a mound of clay. I've had a shit that was like 15 inches long and had the girth of about 7 inches or so. One meal a day helps me not have that anymore.
The early 2000s was such a moronic time >Coca-cola can be used to clean toilets and remove rust
Yeah, it's acidic, sugar itself is fricking acidic what did you expect >Boils coca-cola on high heat until a sticky paste is only left
Yeah that's burnt syrup, are you moronic? It's pretty much all burnt sugar >Look at all that added sugar soda has
Then you realize that milk and juice have pretty much as much sugar since you are shoving 6 oranges into a glass and milk is supposed to feed a fricking cow until it grows up
And all this shit went viral, literally water is wet
You're making the disturbingly common mistake of assuming calorie count is the be-all-end-all of nutrition.
Milk is a source of protein, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and vitamins D and B12. While Coke has zero nutritional value, and is nothing more than a vehicle for artificial sugars and empty calories.
If two people with otherwise identical lifestyles consumed equal amounts of milk and Coke respectively, the Coke drinker would be in far worse condition. So yes, you're likely fat and will die.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
i use coke as a replacement for water at best, not nutrition
>you're likely fat and will die.
where? can a soul be fat? i wonder if my soul is fat
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>can a soul be fat
Oh, it's an ESL. That makes sense.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Do you mean that I'm fat genuinely and unironically, or metaphorically and figuratively?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
How is that an ESL statement? That's normal English. He is asking if a soul is capable of becoming obese; if an ethereal form can have its shape and size affected by the physical body's state. The term ESL isn't meant to be an "I've lost the argument, and need to post an insult to pretend I've won" tool.
That's not what I said at all, their claim was coke has sugar therefore bad and for some reason coke with no sugar also bad when most common alternatives also have lots of sugar
If you drink a ton of milk that's also not good for you and it will get you fat, literally milk exists to fatten up cows
>Look at all that added sugar soda has >Then you realize that milk and juice have pretty much as much sugar
Milk has 12g of sugar per 8 oz. Juice and soda have about 25g.
That's not what I said at all, their claim was coke has sugar therefore bad and for some reason coke with no sugar also bad when most common alternatives also have lots of sugar
If you drink a ton of milk that's also not good for you and it will get you fat, literally milk exists to fatten up cows
>fatten up
No, it's to support healthy growth. Not "fattening up". People will often drink multiple sodas with a meal adding hundreds of extra empty calories. It's a lot harder to do that with milk which is more nutritious and satiating.
The myth: Chuck sold suck and frick.
It was always Chucks feed and seed, until he handed the business off to Sneed to avoid bankruptcy.
Kids just made up the joke "chuck sells frick and suck" because it rhymed, but in reality the primary inventory of the shop has always been feed and seed.
>calories
Calories literally don't matter, and they're usually inaccurate by something like 20%. Apparently you could be on the carnivore diet and be eating like 6,000 calories, but still lose weight (water and/or fat), or stay the same weight (lose water and fat, gain muscle).
"eating healthy", a belief that somehow there are special foods that will somehow make you healthier
in reality, as long as you meet the minimum requirements it will make no difference whatsoever what you eat
I can't drink cola no more cause the phosphoric acid burns my tummy. It's not the caffeine or carbonation cause I can still drink Mountain Dew and energy drinks.
They should bring back the coke energy drinks again so I can drink it.
>opens thread titled "food myths" >sees statement about food that is untrue, a.k.a. a food myth >NUH UH THAT STATEMENT IS WRONG AND YOU ARE WRONG
Autism and illiteracy are a bad combination.
Definitely needs to be communicated more tho.
There are still many people why think you cannot keep cooked(!) chicken outside over night, as if it somehow magically retains its status as a contamination risk meat even after heating it to death and disinfecting.
dude we were taught (public school in connecticut, i was born in 1984) in health class about the food pyramid
they made us fricking draw it and memorize it
maybe it isn't taught now but it was definitely drilled into us for a time
frick I hate this moronic saying, no matter how much caffeine dehydrates you 99% of coke is still water
if they were in the middle of a desert with no food, and had to choose between a bottle of water and a bottle of coke they would go for the water kek
I'D GO for coke because i'd need the calories
>99% of coke is still water
lmao, did you never check the % of sugar content per liter?
Coke is 10% sugar
>Rehydration with soft drink-like beverages exacerbates dehydration and worsens dehydration-associated renal injury
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195650/
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195650/
shhh don't tell them. let the fatties die from kidney failure at 40.
>le long-term kidney damage
>in rats
if you only drank water and had no access to food, you would eventually starve and die. coca cola would also bring negative effects, but you would last longer due to the sugar content
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195650/
i can also paste bullshit studies
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291652206556X
if soft drinks actually caused you to lose your fluids without you even realizing it, then you would hear stories about people dropping dead from it on a regular basis
>at 40
so you can survive for that long while being dehydrated? and you get fat too?
>Coke is 10% sugar
also if you look online, you will find lots of studies pointing that, despite of the composition, coca cola is actually slightly better at retention than water, and that is specifically because of the sugar contents
sugar is one of the contributing factors that make milk better than water, and coca cola also has it, so the same logic applies
It gets confusing because "hydration" is vaguely defined. You piss less immediately after drinking coke because metabolising the sugar involves using up some of the water. You've retained more water because it's been converted into ATP, but if you're the average obese person walking around with blood thicker than putty, that's not really the main concern.
how do I bloodmaxx so I too can have putty in my veins? it sounds like I would be more resilient.
your blood would be more resilient to resist flowing in your veins and clotting, yes
BUT HOW
Your study clearly states stevia solution is better than water.
Also the leap made in that article that sugar water in rats = soft drink in humans is wild. Why not test with soft drink if your goal is to make those claims?
i don't see any sugar
Only sugarfree soda is 99.9% water, dipshit.
Sea water is 96.5% water
if only seawater was 3.5% HFCS... this planet is simply hostile to human life
Coca cola is like 50% sugar (90% corn syrup in America)
in reality it's 10% sugar
This post has been sponsored by the coca cola company.
>you're a shill if you can do basic math
100ml = 100g
I wonder how those who made the daily intake values justify that it's 10% of daily carbs but 29% of daily sugar, since sugar is just carbs.
It's the amount of added sugar you can consume before your risk of health issues starts increasing by larger amounts. But for carbs naturally found in food it's usually not as much of a concern and you can have more.
By what logic? Carbs are carbs.
And what if I eat sugar cane? There's no 'added' sugar in that.
Carbs are carbs but refined sugars (and starch) cause higher blood sugar spikes which lead to inflammation and a bunch of health issues. Not as much of an issue when you eat fruit, whole grains, etc.
You can't really eat sugar cane because it's so fibrous. If you chewed on it and extracted some sugar you'd probably get a sore jaw before extracting very much.
I've tried sugar cane. it's like chewing on a slightly sweet 2x4.
>If you chewed on it and extracted some sugar you'd probably get a sore jaw before extracting very much.
This is what they do in SEA.
90% of coke is water, the rest is mostly sugar, but there are also dyes and preservatives and other shit.
There's no preservatives.
And what's wrong with food colouring? It'll colour your poop at worse.
>There's no preservatives
Wrong
> Phosphoric acid is added to cola drinks to impart tartness, reduce growth of bacteria and fungi, and improve shelf-life
it's used for tartness AND because it's a preservative.
Salt causes hypertension
Breakfast is the most important meal
Any meal that breaks a fast is "breakfast". In that sense, it is the most important.
I'll rip out your throat and shit down your neck you little pedantic frick
And doing so would break my fast.
Doesn't every meal break the fast since the meal before?
Thanks for repeating it.
alcohol is bad for your liver
not a myth
not food related
You don't eat the tobacco after it's cooked?
cigarettes are a diet aid moron
so is working out and jacking off
So doubly not food related
Tobacco is my favorite vegetable
smoking causes cancer
>pee isn't stored in the balls
liver regenerates
you can abuse alcohol and anything and everything at ABUSE LEVELS and if you give the liver a short break, it's fine
it's the magical organ
kidney is not. careful with the kidneys
DNA damages isn't fixable, liver being able to regen or not. That's what alcohol does in the long run. Once the instruction set for cell division is damaged, cells get all fricked up and at that point, it's a coin toss whether or not your immune system or apoptosis (cell death/suicide mechanism) will fix the problem. That's how cancer starts, it could be malignant or not but in general, tumours in an organ is bad news.
cancer starts the moment you are born and cells divide
it is truly luck of the draw and you have to be very unlucky to get any cancer while young
I know that, I'm just saying the liver isn't special and alcohol abuse is carcinogenic to the liver and upper G-I track.
but yes for sure drinking alcohol increases overall cancer risk, for sure. it's definitely bad but not insofar as it puts the liver into a cancerous condition
yes
do cells not divide before you're born then?
in the womb? yes absolutely
>cancer starts the moment you are born
yup
as it stands, the goal would be to avoid things that force your body to roll the dice. sun-tanning is really bad, for example
creating bodyfat from eating too much is also really bad
the idea is that you reduce the cells that can go haywire
Are they trying to find little newborn D’vontavious’ father? Good luck!
>it depends on what the meaning of the word is is
Your cells do not divide in vaccum, your environment and the environment of your cells has causual influence and every toxin you put in has to be processed and excreted, toxins of all kinds and types are created by your system and choosing to tax a system beyond it's limit is where catastrophic failure occurs.
Human bsod
>unlucky
homie cancer is a reaction and easily treatable for the non pharma cucks.
How much of a break are we talking?
A year
depends on your age
6mo is fine when you're 20, when 40 give it a year
i think the big myth is the food pyramid
or that there is some magic that obviates calories in vs calories out for weight loss
that's probably the biggest one
>calories in vs calories out
That that matters. That you shouldn't actually be looking at satiation index or similar.
If you go to the supermarket and buy diet food (lite n' easy and the like) what you will often find is non diet food in tiny portions. So you'll buy two and your diet will fail so you'll never stop buying diet products.
Stop trying to white knuckle your diet.
>i think the big myth is the food pyramid
I think there is an argument to be made that you should be eating a good variety of food but I don't think that it's as essential as they would have you believe, nor do I think the 'experts' are as educated on what people should be eating as they think
For example, a Japanese person is probably going to happily subsist on a completely different diet to someone from France
I'm bad with that but that's just because I'm paranoid about chicken in general, I barely trust it when it's freshly cooked the first time
The food pyramid was created by General Mills to sell more grains. Thats why they switched to myplate and didnt make a sound about all the studies that came back showing a high grain diet is not good for humans. Also why keto is popular
The food pyramid said 2 slices of bread with breakfast, lunch, and dinner would fall within the guidelines. That doesn't really seem to be that much. The food pyramid said you could eat a cheeseburger for every meal with a small salad and piece of fruit and that was acceptable.
Nobody ever really followed it anyway. I'm not sure why it gets so much attention now. I don't remember a single person ever talking about it and using it as a guideline for how they ate. More people talk about it now than they ever did back then.
keto is popular because of marketing, nothing else
"mainstream diet bad therefore my extreme medical restriction diet for epileptics is obviously the one best way to eat!!!" is never going to be a valid argument.
triscuits are safe to eat
underrated
calories being a reliable measurement of anything besides how much heat burning something generates
thats a good point, the human body is not a fire nor do we consume 100% of the food we intake which is why we poop
Calories are a measure of the maximum amount of energy in a food item. CICO works because if you’re counting accurately, the food you’re eating will never contain more than what’s labeled (when labeled accurately).
but the right amount of cal is obfuscated by the amount thats actually usable by your body, if you were able to utilize 100% of the cal then your diet should only be 900cal/day but you'd starve if you're eating actual food that only 300cal of that is actually bio-available
I think people get too caught up on thinking CICO is about calculations and strictly following it. It just says things like fiber and water have zero calories. Carbs and protein have a moderate amount of calories. Fat is high in calories. Eating more carbs/protein/fat will lead to weight gain. Eating less leads to weight loss. That's it.
It's not that useful or a perfect answer to everything though. 12 oz of soda has less calories than 8 oz of milk, but milk will keep you satiated longer and cause you to consume less calories overall.
Calorie counts on food labelling take into account an estimate of how much the body actually uses.
>Carbs are carbs.
Glucose is glucose, it and its chains (most "carbs") get used directly by most body cells. Fructose is primarily metabolised in the liver and used to synthesise fat.
>Fructose is primarily metabolised in the liver and used to synthesise fat.
finally someone else gets it.
The calorie count reflects that. Yo dont gave some hidden magic knowledge
Where do you think the energy comes from? The molecules don't have a special flavour shell, it's the exact same thing. Food and oxygen go in, heat and carbon dioxide come out.
tell me you're diabetic without telling me you're diabetic
any time you are boosting your cells you are risking cancer somewhere
this can be done with anything
without sounding like a complete loon, i have concluded that cancer is inevitable and behaviors can accelerate it. it is a roll of dice, a million times over every day
What're you gonna do about it? Cry? Piss your pants maybe?
Constipation isn't real, food can't make you constipated
I have seen adult ass eat dildos the size of a horse dick and spit it out just fine
>Constipation isn't real
Oh yes it does. I have spit out shits out of my anus that hurt so bad that it felt like I was giving birth. Had to take out more than one shit out of the toilet with a plastic bag to throw it out because it was too huge to flush down. The shits that I had to take out of the toilet had such a thick consistency that it felt like a mound of clay. I've had a shit that was like 15 inches long and had the girth of about 7 inches or so. One meal a day helps me not have that anymore.
anon don't be DeGen. you throw it in the shower and waffle stomp it everybody knows that
umami is a real thing
Covid acrually killed someone.
The early 2000s was such a moronic time
>Coca-cola can be used to clean toilets and remove rust
Yeah, it's acidic, sugar itself is fricking acidic what did you expect
>Boils coca-cola on high heat until a sticky paste is only left
Yeah that's burnt syrup, are you moronic? It's pretty much all burnt sugar
>Look at all that added sugar soda has
Then you realize that milk and juice have pretty much as much sugar since you are shoving 6 oranges into a glass and milk is supposed to feed a fricking cow until it grows up
And all this shit went viral, literally water is wet
>coke and milk both contain some form of sugar therefore they are the same
Are all soda addicts this stupid?
He probably means calories, in which case they are they same.
they still use that moronic "acksually..." logic to justify their shit diets
but you still use that moronic "your fat and you will died" logic to justify your skizo shit
*schizo
but you will die before me, it's basically a guarantee.
in a car crash you mean? i have a twinky body with a negative waist circumference, and my blood tests came clean
You're making the disturbingly common mistake of assuming calorie count is the be-all-end-all of nutrition.
Milk is a source of protein, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and vitamins D and B12. While Coke has zero nutritional value, and is nothing more than a vehicle for artificial sugars and empty calories.
If two people with otherwise identical lifestyles consumed equal amounts of milk and Coke respectively, the Coke drinker would be in far worse condition. So yes, you're likely fat and will die.
i use coke as a replacement for water at best, not nutrition
>you're likely fat and will die.
where? can a soul be fat? i wonder if my soul is fat
>can a soul be fat
Oh, it's an ESL. That makes sense.
Do you mean that I'm fat genuinely and unironically, or metaphorically and figuratively?
How is that an ESL statement? That's normal English. He is asking if a soul is capable of becoming obese; if an ethereal form can have its shape and size affected by the physical body's state. The term ESL isn't meant to be an "I've lost the argument, and need to post an insult to pretend I've won" tool.
That's not what I said at all, their claim was coke has sugar therefore bad and for some reason coke with no sugar also bad when most common alternatives also have lots of sugar
If you drink a ton of milk that's also not good for you and it will get you fat, literally milk exists to fatten up cows
>Look at all that added sugar soda has
>Then you realize that milk and juice have pretty much as much sugar
Milk has 12g of sugar per 8 oz. Juice and soda have about 25g.
>fatten up
No, it's to support healthy growth. Not "fattening up". People will often drink multiple sodas with a meal adding hundreds of extra empty calories. It's a lot harder to do that with milk which is more nutritious and satiating.
The myth: Chuck sold suck and frick.
It was always Chucks feed and seed, until he handed the business off to Sneed to avoid bankruptcy.
Kids just made up the joke "chuck sells frick and suck" because it rhymed, but in reality the primary inventory of the shop has always been feed and seed.
people who say peanut butter is a good source of protein
well it's not bad. especially when topped with hempseed
>calories
Calories literally don't matter, and they're usually inaccurate by something like 20%. Apparently you could be on the carnivore diet and be eating like 6,000 calories, but still lose weight (water and/or fat), or stay the same weight (lose water and fat, gain muscle).
Calories are a meme. Fact: nobody ITT has ever seen a calorie.
>post moronic food myths
If you swallow chewing gun it'll stay in your stomach for 7 years!
that's not a myth, I heard about a kid that had to have a 10 pound ball of gum removed from his stomach
>I heard about a kid that had to have a 10 pound ball of gum removed from his stomach
No way! I heard the same thing.
Your body can't digest guns.
The handle and the mechanism should be gone pretty quickly, but the barrel could take some time
food has an expiration date
butter is bad for you
lard is bad for you
meat is bad for you
HFCS is harmless
salt is bad for you
wine is good for you
Salting the water makes it boil faster
>empty calories
Absolutely meaningless nonsense thrown around to discredit mostly sugar.
You're fat.
It means calories without much other nutrition. I would consider highly refined oils to be empty calories too.
"eating healthy", a belief that somehow there are special foods that will somehow make you healthier
in reality, as long as you meet the minimum requirements it will make no difference whatsoever what you eat
bullshit obviously, try drinking only seed oils and eating only sugar to meet your daily requirements vs balanced meals.
See above, re: minimum requirements
the heat of the egg cooks the rice
I can't drink cola no more cause the phosphoric acid burns my tummy. It's not the caffeine or carbonation cause I can still drink Mountain Dew and energy drinks.
They should bring back the coke energy drinks again so I can drink it.
Hot food can only sit out for 2 hours before it needs to be thrown away because muh bacterial growth
Not even close to true
Yeah you're in a food myth thread dummy
>opens thread titled "food myths"
>sees statement about food that is untrue, a.k.a. a food myth
>NUH UH THAT STATEMENT IS WRONG AND YOU ARE WRONG
Autism and illiteracy are a bad combination.
Definitely needs to be communicated more tho.
There are still many people why think you cannot keep cooked(!) chicken outside over night, as if it somehow magically retains its status as a contamination risk meat even after heating it to death and disinfecting.
Op isnt a gay
It does too!
dude we were taught (public school in connecticut, i was born in 1984) in health class about the food pyramid
they made us fricking draw it and memorize it
maybe it isn't taught now but it was definitely drilled into us for a time